Spreadsheets, Charts, and Graphics
Scroll down or click for
Ohio | Florida | California | Nevada | Iowa | South Dakota | New Mexico | Wisconsin
The 2004 Ohio
Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis:
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush
Votes
Excerpts:
"Seven-eights of voters in heavily-Democratic Cuyahoga
County, more than one of every eight Ohio Kerry voters, could have voted at an adjacent precinct using the wrong ballot order."
"... I focus on one Presidential
election issue, cross-voting—how votes
cast one way are counted as a vote for a different candidate or option. I also focus on Ohio and a particular area with one-tenth of the Ohio vote, Cuyahoga County. ... This article discusses problems with the 2004 Ohio Presidential election generally and demonstrates how the Cuyahoga County election was inherently unfair and resulted in many Kerry votes going uncounted, counted as third-party votes, or being switched to Bush votes...."
"In a sample of 166,953 votes, one of every 34 Ohio
voters, the Kerry-Bush margin shifts 6.15% ..."
Continue reading: How Kerry Votes Were witched to
Bush Votes (updated April 2008)
|
The
charts displayed below are samples from the spreadsheets.
Florida
Only in Florida does % Kerry fail to
correlate with % Democrats.
Why?
In Florida, electronic voting correlations do not
match other voting methods.
In Florida, the 2004 Bush increase correlates with the percentage of
Democrats, moreso in
E-Touch counties than in Op-Scan counties. In Op-Scan counties, the
2004 Bush increase
negatively correlates to the percentage of registered Republicans. At
the same time, Bush Increase
has no correlation with Bush votes in E-Touch counties and a strong
correlation in Op-Scan counties.
Top
Various States 2004
In South Dakota, the percentage of non-partisan voters has a strong
correlation
with the percentage of Daschle votes only in the counties with paper
ballots.
The Kerry and Daschle correlations match in paper ballot counties.
New Mexico
In New Mexico, why does the Sequoia and Danther E-voting equipment
fail to count so many votes? On average, 2.62% of voters did not vote
per these machines, compared to 0.46% non-votes in the Op-Scan
counties.
United Voters of New Mexico - Statistical Analysis of
Voting Results
|
Wisconsin 2011 Supreme
Court:
wisconsin_2011_workbook.xls
milwaukee_city_scatterplots.xls
Click files below to view
full-scale versions.
TOP
All the spreadsheets are Excel files.
© 2015
by James Q. Jacobs. All Rights Reserved. jqjacobs.net | Contact
|