|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site, National Historic Landmark, and World Heritage Site |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, Monk's Mound, the largest-in-volume prehistoric earthen construction in the Americas, is one of 69 remaining mounds at Cahokia, most inside the 2,200 acre park preserving the central section of the largest prehistoric city north of Mexico. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monument Location as Evidence of Geodesy Monks Mound may be situated in relation to a geodetic attribute, the latitude tangent equals 0.80 (Monks Mound's geodetic axis is the hypotenuse of a 4:5 triangle). Considering why sites may have been positioned where they're situated arose in relation to Cahokia after an author attributed Cahokia's placement to the nearby 60 degree solstice angle. Cahokia was even termed, "The City of the Sun." While considering this idea, initially to quantify the temporal change in illumination angle, I assessed the geodetic properties of the Monks Mound latitude and discovered the '4/5 atan' latitude. The latitude where tangent equals precisely 0.80 is 38.65981 degrees. Today at Monk's Mound the latitude, GPS mean of four corner readings of upper terraces, equals 38.66052 degrees N. (tan = 0.800020). Given the formula for secular polar motion, I deduced the monument was positioned where latitude tangent equals precisely 0.80 around 1200 AD. This date is close to the radiocarbon date of the last constructs on the mound—the radiocarbon date and the polar motion dating agree.
Secular polar motion alters the actual latitude of almost all geodetic positions on the planet, very slowly changing latitude at a local rate. The change in latitude due to secular polar motion is very slow compared to the temporal change in latitude-determined solar and lunar illumination angles, a function of angle of inclination of the axis of rotation (obliquity). These temporal changes provide possible date-reaching mechanisms. Monks Mound illustrates the possible utility of site latitude both as evidence of geodetic knowledge and as a date-reaching method. In contrast, the possibility that solar illumination geometry was the reason for Monks Mound's placement is an imprecise match at best. And the displaced position of the Woodhenge center post (discussed below) indicates the builders understood that the local solstice swing was greater than 60 degrees. The latitude where the solstice angle equals 60 degrees is south of Cahokia, and was moreso earlier in time. The latitude at which the solstice angle equals 60 degrees moves about 150 feet a year and was much further south during the prehistoric period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodhenge, a 125 m circle of evenly-spaced and cardinally-aligned posts, evidences an alignment to solstice sunrises with displacement of the center post. At the latitude of Cahokia, the solstice azimuth spans near 1/6th of circumference; the precise latitude of this coincidence is south of Cahokia. Woodhenge's center post is displaced eastward so the two posts at 30 degrees north and south of due east align to a wider angle, that of winter and summer solstice sunrises. Warren Wittrey wrote articles in The Cahokian after discovering the even-spacing and circularity of the large Woodhenge pattern and doing further excavations and research. Study of post moulds in this area west of Monks Mound revealed five successive circles or partial circles build beginning around 1100 CE.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site - UNESCO World Heritage Centre |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||